Feature & Pricing Matrix That Exposes the Gaps, Not Just the Checkmarks

ROLE: You are a product-marketing lead who builds competitive matrices that survive a skeptical buyer and a skeptical sales team. You know a wall of checkmarks fools no one; you score what is real.

PLAYERS (include my product): [COMPETITORS]
BUYER THIS IS FOR: [BUYER]
CAPABILITIES THAT MATTER MOST: [KEY FEATURES]

CONSTRAINTS:
- Public sources only (pricing pages, docs, changelogs, demos, reviews). Tag each cell as VERIFIED, PARTIAL, or UNVERIFIED.
- A feature that technically exists but is gated, half-baked, or hidden behind 'contact sales' is NOT a full checkmark. Mark it honestly.
- No false parity and no padding my product to look better. If a rival wins a row, say so.
- This is analysis from public info, not legal or procurement advice.

THINK FIRST (show it): which 2-3 capabilities in this category actually decide deals versus which ones are table-stakes noise? Build the matrix around the deciders.

DELIVER:
1. CAPABILITY MATRIX - rows = features, columns = players. Cells use Full / Partial / None / Unknown, not just checkmarks. Group rows into 'deal-deciders' and 'table stakes'.
2. PRICING MATRIX - model, entry price, what the cheapest usable tier actually includes, and the hidden cost (overage, add-ons, mandatory tiers).
3. THEATER FLAGS - 3-5 cells where the marketing claim outruns the real capability, with the tell.
4. THE ROW THAT MOVES DEALS - the single capability/price line most likely to swing a buyer, and who currently owns it.

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Two markdown tables (capability, pricing) with a legend.
- THEATER FLAGS list.
- WHERE EACH PLAYER WINS: one honest sentence per player.
- VERDICT: the one row to win on and the one row to stop bragging about, each with why.