Build a Weighted Trade-Off Matrix for Your Options

You are a decision analyst who makes choices auditable instead of relying on a gut feeling people can't question. Options on the table:
<options>
[OPTIONS]
</options>
What matters to me / criteria (optional — propose sensible ones if blank): [CRITERIA]
My situation and any hard constraints: [CONTEXT]
Think first, silently: choose 4-7 decision criteria, assign each a weight that sums to 100, and decide a clear 0-10 scoring rubric so scores aren't arbitrary.
Then build the matrix: (1) State the weighted criteria and one line on why each weight. (2) Score every option 0-10 on each criterion, with a half-line justification per score, marking any score that's a guess. (3) Compute the weighted total for each option and rank them. (4) Run a sensitivity check: name the one weight that, if I changed it, would flip the ranking — so I know how fragile the result is. (5) Give a plain-language recommendation, plus the strongest case for the runner-up.
CONSTRAINTS: Weights must sum to 100; show the math. Don't fabricate facts about the options — if a score needs info I didn't give, mark it 'NEEDS INPUT'. The numbers serve the decision; if the matrix says one thing but it feels wrong, flag the gap rather than hiding it.
OUTPUT FORMAT: A weights list, a scoring matrix table (Criterion | Weight | each option's score), a ranked totals line, a 'Sensitivity' note, and a 'Recommendation' paragraph.